Key mous that is verified by the password requires the separate implementation of a password (which may be smaller than a key) in a way that is both private and integrity. These are designed to withstand man-in-the-middle and other active attacks on the password and established keys. For example, DH-EKE, SPEKE and SRP are Diffie-Hellman password authentication variants. The right of related employer groups to join the plan is defined in their employment contracts and in the protocol agreement between the university and the affiliated employer, provided that such conditions of affiliation are not contrary to the terms of the law. Example: Common Protocols for Service Providers (South Africa) In order to formalize cooperation between the various partners, it may be useful to clearly identify the objective of cooperation and to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each member. Often, fundamental objectives, agreements and agreements are described in a coordinated response in a Memorandum of Understanding (Memorandum of Understanding) sometimes referred to as the Memorandum of Understanding. It is a formal document, but not legally binding, which should be signed by all relevant agencies and individuals. MoUs can allow organizations to go beyond occasional interactions on a case-by-case basis and effectively integrate common work into an institution`s to-do list (Grieger et al., 2004). A large number of cryptographic authentication schemes and protocols have been designed to provide authenticated key agreements to prevent man-in-the-middle and related attacks.
These methods generally mathematically link the agreed key to other agreed data, such as. B the following protocols: Protocols can also be developed to further document the interaction agreements between agencies and sectors, roles and responsibilities within the coordination group and in their own bodies/agencies or procedures of representatives to be followed in certain situations. A protocol is essentially a common agreement between parties or agencies, which formalizes relations between services and defines common codes of conduct (Olle, 2005). The protocol agreements provide a framework for further cooperation between the provincial government and First Nations in Alberta. It will be a broad framework agreement in which judicious discussions, exchanges of information and investigations into issues of mutual interest can occur. Both protocols must be maintained as long as each party wishes to actively maintain them. In accordance with each agreement, meetings will continue to take place: since, by nature, coordinated reactions include several agencies or sectors, it is essential that all parties involved participate in the development and approval of agreements or protocols deemed necessary to support coordination, as this entails a buy-in and increases the likelihood of implementation of agreements or protocols.